| 1 |
Cory Visi <merlin@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think this is a good idea. We just need to call it something that |
| 3 |
> doesn't cause endless confusion. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Sticking something like a "non-complete version" sticker on it would |
| 6 |
help. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> On a related note, keeping with the philosophy here, I would say that |
| 9 |
> Opera does not qualify for this new flag, because it works out of the |
| 10 |
> box. Even if it has ads, it still works. However, Opera is obviously |
| 11 |
> commercial, so this is another reason to perhaps think up another name |
| 12 |
> for the flag. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
<nitpick> |
| 15 |
Opera is now ad-free. And while still not open-source, it's now both |
| 16 |
free (of charge) and free (of ads) |
| 17 |
</nitpick> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Matti |
| 20 |
-- |
Archives