| 1 |
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:46:06 +0100 |
| 2 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this: |
| 4 |
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar |
| 5 |
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is |
| 8 |
> using arrows or something like that |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> package2[foo?->bar] or package2[foo->bar?] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> now i handle it that way both packages have same useflag. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Uhm... What's wrong with "foo? ( package2[bar] )"? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The shortcut [use?] forms are there because practical experience showed |
| 17 |
them being very widely used, but they're just that -- shortcuts for |
| 18 |
widely used cases. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This lot should probably be in the new developer quiz, if anyone's |
| 21 |
maintaining it these days. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives