| 1 |
El jue, 11-09-2014 a las 19:29 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: |
| 2 |
> [to the list since we have to sort this out somehow] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Hi Pacho, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> why did you remove the firebird masks without removing the ebuilds? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.16019&r2=1.16020 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Are the issues fixed? (The sec bug is still open.) Now firebird is back |
| 11 |
> unmasked in the tree... and you're also removing the use.masks. This has also, |
| 12 |
> it seems confused Patrick, who in the meantime started re-adding part of the |
| 13 |
> masks because of broken deps. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Cheers, |
| 16 |
> Andreas |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I removed them :/ |
| 20 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/firebird/firebird-2.5.2.26539.0.ebuild?hideattic=0&view=log |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
All but the latest version that wasn't affected by security bug as per I |
| 23 |
saw in bug #460780 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
07 Sep 2014; Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
| 26 |
-files/firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-CVE-2008-0387.patch, |
| 27 |
-files/firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-CVE-2008-0467.patch, |
| 28 |
-files/firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-external-libs.patch, |
| 29 |
-files/firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-flags.patch, |
| 30 |
-files/firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-make-deps.patch, |
| 31 |
-files/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-deps-flags-libs.patch, |
| 32 |
-files/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-gcc-icu-declare.patch, |
| 33 |
-files/firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-build.patch, |
| 34 |
-files/firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-client.patch, |
| 35 |
-files/firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-deps-flags-libs.patch, |
| 36 |
-files/firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-deps-flags.patch, |
| 37 |
-files/firebird-2.5.0.26074.0-superclassic.patch, |
| 38 |
-firebird-2.0.3.12981.0-r6.ebuild, -firebird-2.1.3.18185.0-r1.ebuild, |
| 39 |
-firebird-2.5.2.26539.0.ebuild, metadata.xml: |
| 40 |
Remove vulnerable versions, move to maintainer-needed (#460780) |
Archives