Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | ||
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:54:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140116155407.13492.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Sergey Popov |
||
| 1 | Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 2 | > As i said earlier, problem begins when we NEED to stabilize |
| 3 | > something to prevent breakages and arch teams are slow. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Isn't that simply a matter of assigning and respecting priority on |
| 6 | bugs properly? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |