| 1 |
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting |
| 4 |
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I |
| 5 |
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent |
| 6 |
> elsewhere. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general and |
| 9 |
assurance in particular? This is something that repoman might check for, |
| 10 |
and issue a warning. It has nothing to do with end-user quality. It even |
| 11 |
is no problem for developers trying to understand the ebuild. It is only |
| 12 |
a coding style violation, not a QA violation. Coding style is to present |
| 13 |
a uniform view to things, so things look proper. QA is about things being |
| 14 |
proper, not looking proper. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Paul |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 20 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 21 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 22 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives