| 1 |
On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use it. if |
| 3 |
> Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen irregardless of |
| 4 |
> what Alec is proposing. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
we are talking about public, shared work on gentoo - not about stuff |
| 7 |
people do in private. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> your logic does not lead to the statement that gentoo-core is the appropriate |
| 11 |
> place. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
point takes, it's not the non-technical nature - i should put it |
| 14 |
clearer: it's the fact that everyone on the net will be able to read |
| 15 |
what anyone said on google in this thread. any one of us may change his |
| 16 |
mind on that but the internet won't. |
| 17 |
does that make it clear now why that thread belongs to gentoo-core to me? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> a bit ironic you espouse using open source software on fully controlled |
| 21 |
> systems in one half while suggesting people use the closed gentoo-core mailing |
| 22 |
> list in another ... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
not every kind of open and closed are in contrast. i don't see any |
| 25 |
irony here. the FSF is doing PR strategy stuff behind closed doors too, |
| 26 |
what's the problem? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
sebastian |
Archives