1 |
I make a lot of binaries for use on other systems, to expedite updates. |
2 |
It does not make sense for some packages to ever be a binary package. |
3 |
|
4 |
Packages like -bin packages or gentoo-sources, which are just sources. |
5 |
Having binary ebuilds of those is of no benefit. I can be the opposite |
6 |
causing things to be much slower. Like in the case of large things |
7 |
packages like android-studio. |
8 |
|
9 |
Just seems odd to make a binary of a binary, or repackage |
10 |
gentoo-sources into a gentoo ebuild binary/binpkg. There is not really |
11 |
any benefit either way for such packages. |
12 |
|
13 |
It would be beneficial if ebuilds could have some internal variable |
14 |
that prevents it from being a binary package. It should not prevent |
15 |
merge or fail. Just never create a binary of this package, always use |
16 |
the ebuild as normal. Even if someone is force installing using binary |
17 |
flag or otherwise. |
18 |
|
19 |
As most things I think this would require support in PMS, or next EAPI |
20 |
at minimum. But I think the EAPI comes from PMS, so they are related. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |