Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for /usr/share/doc hierarchy
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:24:44
Message-Id: 200404032332.32918.stuart@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for /usr/share/doc hierarchy by Matthew Kennedy
1 On Saturday 03 April 2004 08:34, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
2 > Leo Laursen <ll_news@××××××××.dk> writes:
3 > > Eg. /usr/share/doc/mutt-1.5.6 would be
4 > > /usr/share/doc/net-mail/mutt/mutt-1.5.6
5 > >
6 > > It should be quite easy to implement (I think).
7
8 This seems like a reasonable idea.
9
10 > You proposal has a sub-directory for the portage category. I
11 > wouldn't bother with that. A flat view is more useful, IMO.
12
13 Having the category as a directory would seem to make docs easier to navigate.
14
15 > You
16 > also have a sub-directory for versions -- that is not really
17 > necessary -- most packages have only one slot.
18
19 Urgh. No. This remains very necessary. Every single web-based app will be
20 SLOT'ed by the time we are done.
21
22 Best regards,
23 Stu
24 --
25 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
26 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
27 Missed the php|cruise? http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/cruise-2004/
28
29 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
30 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
31 --
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list