| 1 |
m h wrote: |
| 2 |
> Like I said, if you are interested in manipulating wars from ant or |
| 3 |
> maven perhaps cargo is for you. I'm assumming this is more of the |
| 4 |
> programmer/qa type person who wants this sort of functionality. My |
| 5 |
> end user is a sys-admin. They are usually more comfortable from the |
| 6 |
> command line. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I've updated my caveats section |
| 9 |
> (http://developer.spikesource.com/wiki/index.php/Article:Warconfig ) |
| 10 |
> with Cargo information. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
Disclaimer: I'm familar with cargo because we use it at work, but not |
| 13 |
intimately so, because I haven't been involved with the implementation |
| 14 |
and whatnot. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
My impressions of cargo is that it is supposed to be pretty container |
| 17 |
agnostic. You mostly point it at a host, with username, password, etc, |
| 18 |
and it'll deploy the app for you. This would be pretty nice, since you |
| 19 |
wouldn't have to worry about the implementation details of where webapps |
| 20 |
should live. Additionally, you could use it to build wars on one |
| 21 |
machine, and deploy them remotely without much trouble. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So if the issue that there isn't a command line interface, perhaps it is |
| 24 |
worth writing? Also, we could probably write a generic ant script, and |
| 25 |
provide a scripted frontend for it to make it dynamic. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Joshua Nichols |
| 29 |
Gentoo/Java Project Lead |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives