1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> after dealing with m68k, mips, and the *-fbsd ports, i think we could do with |
3 |
> a new state for profiles.desc. the new field would simply be "exp" to |
4 |
> indicate that the profile is experimental and that qa tools should generally |
5 |
> not issue warnings about them. so in repoman's default mode, you wouldnt get |
6 |
> any warnings, but if you were to run it in full mode, you'd see stuff like |
7 |
> normal. this is useful for new projects which are still in the process of |
8 |
> merging (like *-fbsd, m68k, and any new hardware i get my hands on) and are |
9 |
> not really ready for "dev" marking. there are plenty of warnings in packages |
10 |
> right now due to these profiles being labeled as "dev" that are the sole |
11 |
> problem of the keyword maintainer in question and not the package maintainer. |
12 |
> -mike |
13 |
> |
14 |
I've very much been a proponent of properly listing out all of our |
15 |
profiles in profiles.desc. This sounds very reasonable and logical. And |
16 |
hopefully if the tools in question are coded properly, it should be |
17 |
compatible with older versions until users upgrade. |
18 |
|
19 |
Good stuff Mike. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Doug Klima |
23 |
Gentoo Developer |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |