1 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > Ok, so the latter saves me from repeating all standard functions |
4 |
> > with emake -j1. Thanks. |
5 |
> sorry, i'll be a bit more specific ... the reason appending MAKEOPTS |
6 |
> has been sliding is due to the large volume of gnome ebuilds and |
7 |
> integrated eclasses ... it isnt trivial to pass that information |
8 |
> along since the emake happens in nested eclasses, so MAKEOPTS gets |
9 |
> incremented in the ebuild |
10 |
|
11 |
It is an ebuild based on gnome.eclass, so it hits your case. :) |
12 |
|
13 |
> if you're doing it to avoid -j1 in like two calls to emake, that's |
14 |
> poor taste :p |
15 |
|
16 |
I did not want to repeat whole gnome.eclass definitions. |
17 |
|
18 |
> also, any package that fails -j1 building should have an open bug |
19 |
> about it ... parallel building isnt something to be workedaround with |
20 |
> -j1 and then ignored as it can severely screw people (consider |
21 |
> systems that have a crap ton of slow procs -- common for mips people) |
22 |
|
23 |
That software is from 2005 and I can't help it as I was doing arch |
24 |
maintenance, maintainers were not reacting => not my beer anymore. |
25 |
|
26 |
V-Li |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
30 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
31 |
|
32 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |