Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: x11@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Dropping autotools-utils from xorg-2
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 14:51:23
Message-Id: CAJ0EP40sHfeGoAQP9iR76CKkKqPhRKp3UTqiimrq+WVEJW_2TA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Dropping autotools-utils from xorg-2 by Ian Stakenvicius
1 On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 >> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
4 >>
5 >> The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
6 >> autotools-multilib eclasses, which are banned in EAPI 6.
7 >>
8 >> This patchset attempts to remove any trace of autotools-utils from ebuilds
9 >> using xorg-2.
10 >>
11 >> Note that I am touching stable ebuilds here to avoid forking an "xorg-3"
12 >> eclass. If there is a strong feeling that this is too dangerous, I can alter
13 >> my approach. I have build tested most packages using xorg-2, and only a few
14 >> had issues.
15 >>
16 >
17 > Although I commend you for these efforts, given that this deprecation is also linked to EAPI6, why not instead bump to XORG-3 requiring EAPI6, take advantage of all the simplifications, and this will allow/enforce migration of all the ebuilds as well in turn?
18 >
19 > It would be nice for instance to drop the epatch stuffs at the same time, if we could...
20 >
21
22 If the x11 team wants to go that way, that's fine. It's just a lot
23 more work to update all the ebuilds, so I would need people to help
24 out.