Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ernst Herzberg <earny@×××××.de>
To: Vadim <vadim_t@××××××××.es>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Horrible package descriptions
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 23:20:19
Message-Id: 200305230120.14640.earny@net4u.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Horrible package descriptions by Vadim
1 On Freitag, 23. Mai 2003 00:06, Vadim wrote:
2
3 > Sure, that sometimes works. But not always. I can think of multiple
4 > problems with that. For example:
5 >
6 > That assumes that the web site says something useful about it. It might
7 > be a site from somebody who just put his/her stuff on the web in case
8 > somebody find it useful, with no documentation at all. Or it might
9 > happen to be some obscure tiny tool made by a large company that's got a
10 > huge site where you have to search for 15 minutes until your find
11 > something.
12 >
13 > Sometimes, you have network problems too. The site might be down. Or
14 > have moved somewhere else. Or perhaps you have a local Gentoo mirror and
15 > no internet connection due to problems/paranoid security.
16 >
17 > Then, there is a problem with searching. I'd like to be able to find
18 > SAMBA without knowing how it, or the protocol is called. Most people
19 > might try to search for "windows network", for example. The URL is not
20 > very helpful when you know what kind of tool you want, but not the exact
21 > tool.
22
23 Put the long descriptions in a separate package, like a gentoo description
24 database. If somebody need it, he can emerge it. Then the portage tree
25 will not grow because of the long descriptions, and you can split the
26 descrition database for example in pieces, so you dont have to download
27 the complete database if one package description changes.
28 If emerge -S find such a database, it will search that too, if not, then
29 not ;-)
30
31 If somebody even has enough sparetime, this package can be easy extended,
32 for example to search also a database on the net..
33
34 ... only thinking....
35
36 <Earny>
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Horrible package descriptions John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu>