| 1 |
I had put that I would never see it because all gtk+ is being used for on this |
| 2 |
box is to run gkrellm2, on the occasion when I'm running it. The only time I |
| 3 |
get file choices are through the xmms plugin, otherwise I can recall no other |
| 4 |
instances. This is why I'd personally choose not to have the icons, or the |
| 5 |
libxml2,etc., as gtk+ itself is a heavy enough dep for that one app. I hold no |
| 6 |
bias against plain gtk+ users to have their icons, as I have been that route |
| 7 |
in the past, and it is a fine base for those applications, and the sprucing up |
| 8 |
would help. I have also thought about liquidx's idea of injecting the |
| 9 |
packages, but that does cause minor extra maintenence, and the idea of |
| 10 |
injecting means (to me) that we need to inject because of lack of choice. |
| 11 |
Cutting this short, I would have no objection to a local USE of "filechooser" |
| 12 |
or "icons" so that each interested party can make their own choice. |
| 13 |
Thanks. |
| 14 |
--- |
| 15 |
Chuck Brewer |
| 16 |
Registered Linux User #284015 |
| 17 |
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
------------------------------------------------- |
| 21 |
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives