| 1 |
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:12:25 +0200 |
| 2 |
Tobias Klausmann <klausman@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi! |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Sun, 07 Oct 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>: |
| 9 |
> > > I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off |
| 10 |
> > > system we have now is suboptimal. I could be wrong of course. |
| 11 |
> > > Please comment. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > This key=value systems sounds interesting. Another use could be |
| 14 |
> > the choice between xulrunner, seamonkey, firefox. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We already have this with USE_EXPAND. Not exactly the same syntax, but |
| 17 |
I don't see a terrible problem in that, and we don't have to fix all |
| 18 |
three trillion related tools to handle it. Unless you can come up |
| 19 |
with a case that can't be handled with USE_EXPAND. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> And maybe it can be alleviated for some of the virtuals problem |
| 22 |
> space. For those apps that need an editor, one could think of |
| 23 |
> editor=vim. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I don't see how this is related at all, as the packages need an editor, |
| 26 |
but don't care which editor. So what would USE="editor=vim" do? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Marius |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives