1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 20.04.2017 kell 18:17, kirjutas Walter Dnes: |
2 |
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > The default is new: |
5 |
> > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++1 |
6 |
> > 1-abi.html |
7 |
> |
8 |
> And the news item says... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ...which means that people like me, who currently have 4.9.4, won't |
13 |
> know |
14 |
> about it until after the fact. Then they'd have to... |
15 |
|
16 |
You will still have 4.9.4 until you unmerge it, and will still use |
17 |
4.9.4 until you gcc-config to gcc5. |
18 |
|
19 |
> GCC 5.4 Status: 2016-06-03 (regression fixes & docs only). |
20 |
> |
21 |
> GCC 6.3 Status: 2016-12-21 (regression fixes & docs only). |
22 |
> |
23 |
> GCC 7.1 Status: 2017-04-20 (frozen, all changes require RM approval). |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Development: GCC 8.0 Status: 2017-04-20 (regression fixes & docs |
26 |
> only). |
27 |
|
28 |
Notice how 4.9 isn't even mentioned there as receiving regression fixes |
29 |
or whatnot anymore. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Maybe we should what many enterprises do with Windows; i.e. skip a |
32 |
> version and go straight to gcc-6. |
33 |
|
34 |
No. Maybe with gcc 5 to 7. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Other than that, I am terribly sorry for your inconvenience. But 2014 |
38 |
called and wanted its compiler back :( So we are "bleeding edge" again |