1 |
On 27/08/2020 12:37, Max Magorsch wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? |
4 |
>> It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling |
5 |
>> those manually for some time now ;) |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I think we could use the remoteid in future to improve the repology |
9 |
> warnings. However, I am not fully convinced that we can completely |
10 |
> replace the repology check using the remoteid, as a simple grep shows, |
11 |
> that currently 9873 packages contain at least one remote id. That's |
12 |
> just half of our packages in the tree. So I could imagine that we do |
13 |
> use the remoteid whenever it is available and otherwise fall back on |
14 |
> the repology data. However, for this to work we would need to things |
15 |
> imo: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> 1) Get the latest version available given the remoteid |
18 |
> 2) Compare the latest version available with our latest version |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It's especially the second part that I think is not done that quickly. |
21 |
> However, if anyone is interested in coming up with some logic / code |
22 |
> for this, any contributions are highly welcome. |
23 |
> |
24 |
Another cool addition, thanks :) |
25 |
|
26 |
While we're on the topic of remoteid, could you please add links for |
27 |
those somewhere in the package page? |
28 |
I opened a bug for this a long time ago and I think it would be a nice |
29 |
addition to the HOMEPAGE URL: |
30 |
|
31 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/657018 |