Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <msterret@××××.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ebuild inheritance question
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:04:20
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.58.0312290305010.15298@rutrow.coat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild inheritance question by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2
3 > the way dependencies work right now with respect to eclasses is pretty
4 > simple ...
5 >
6 > eclasses ALWAYS use newdepend, newrdepend, newpdepend, newcdepend ... they
7 > should NEVER have DEPEND= or similar ...
8 > flip side of the coin is that ebuilds should not be using the newXdepend, they
9 > should be using DEPEND= ...
10 >
11 > i think thats clear enough so i'll leave this alone ;)
12
13 I don't think this is true. If you look at the existing eclasses you
14 can see a lot of DEPEND= in there.
15
16 Michael Sterrett
17 -Mr. Bones.-
18 mr_bones_@g.o
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: ebuild inheritance question Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>