1 |
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> the way dependencies work right now with respect to eclasses is pretty |
4 |
> simple ... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> eclasses ALWAYS use newdepend, newrdepend, newpdepend, newcdepend ... they |
7 |
> should NEVER have DEPEND= or similar ... |
8 |
> flip side of the coin is that ebuilds should not be using the newXdepend, they |
9 |
> should be using DEPEND= ... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> i think thats clear enough so i'll leave this alone ;) |
12 |
|
13 |
I don't think this is true. If you look at the existing eclasses you |
14 |
can see a lot of DEPEND= in there. |
15 |
|
16 |
Michael Sterrett |
17 |
-Mr. Bones.- |
18 |
mr_bones_@g.o |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |