1 |
Sounds interesting, if your willing to help with an implementation I |
2 |
would suppose that we could get something together. Let me know on or |
3 |
off the list and we'll set something up. |
4 |
|
5 |
Anyone else interested? |
6 |
|
7 |
-- |
8 |
JR Boyens |
9 |
jboyens@×××××××.edu |
10 |
|
11 |
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 09:55, Tod M. Neidt wrote: |
12 |
> Hi! |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Was looking at Bug 551 ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551 ) |
15 |
> this morning. I believe this particular error was generated because the |
16 |
> user was downloading and install additional perl modules using the |
17 |
> CPAN.pm module that comes with the perl-5.6.1 package, but didn't have |
18 |
> the required perl module dependency libnet installed prior to installing |
19 |
> the telnet module. Info on the CPAN.pm module can be found at |
20 |
> http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/CPAN/perl/CPAN.html |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Note: I successfully merged the dev-perl/Net-Telnet ebuild using portage |
23 |
> and the dev-perl/libnet ebuild was merged first like it is supposed to |
24 |
> so this really isn't a portage or ebuild issue. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> However, this situation does bring up an interesting question regarding |
27 |
> a possible enhancement. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Would it be possible (or even desirable) to hack CPAN.pm and/or portage |
30 |
> so that they play nice together, i.e. a user could find and download |
31 |
> perl modules using CPAN.pm and portage would provide the installation |
32 |
> and package management? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Some Advantages: |
36 |
> |
37 |
> 1. Useful feature for Gentoo users accustomed to enhancing perl with |
38 |
> modules through the CPAN.pm module. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> 2. Possibility to effectively eleminate the dev-perl portage category, |
41 |
> while at the same time, (less burden on Gentoo.org servers, and perl |
42 |
> module ebuild maintainers) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> 3. providing *all* the perl modules archived at cpan (the archive) to |
45 |
> Gentoo users. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> 4. Cool hack :) |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Some Disadvantages: |
51 |
> |
52 |
> 1. Extra work maintaining a CPAN.pm-gentoo.diff |
53 |
> |
54 |
> 2. perl <--> python interface might be difficult? |
55 |
> |
56 |
> 3. package management accounting if both perl module ebuilds and CPAN.pm |
57 |
> installations are tracked in /var/db/pkg/ |
58 |
> |
59 |
> As I am not worthy to wash the feet of a perl deity, I am interested in |
60 |
> the thoughts of those who are. |
61 |
> |
62 |
> tod |
63 |
> |
64 |
> |
65 |
> |
66 |
> |
67 |
> _______________________________________________ |
68 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
69 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
70 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
71 |
> |