| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On 25 Mar 2002 12:41:11 +0200 |
| 3 |
Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Just some thoughts. I have two boxes here. Both have the latest |
| 6 |
> libxml, libxml2 and libxslt. The one compile scrollkeeper fine, as well |
| 7 |
> as nautilus. The other do not compile nautilus .... quit with libxml/ |
| 8 |
> libxml2 headers not found. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I think it is something other than libxml[12] that is causing things to |
| 11 |
> break. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
now this is interesting, What version of nautilus? (stable version 1.0.6 or what it is?) Could you please give me the logs of the whole thing and I'll try and look at it? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
ebuild --debug nautilus-x.x.x.ebuild compile > /tmp/nautilus1.log 2>&1 |
| 17 |
ebuild --debug nautilus-x.x.x.ebuild compile > /tmp/nautilus2.log 2>&1 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
also.. check the mozilla versions, nautilus relies on mozilla to compile and requires a specific version... broken but that's because of the mozilla view is used for html rendering, and mozilla pre 1.0 changes the interface api all the time. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
//Spider |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
begin happy99.exe |
| 26 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 27 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 28 |
end |
Archives