| 1 |
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:08:41 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Maybe as a start, the Developer's Guide can be revised to state that: |
| 4 |
| |
| 5 |
| "Ideally any bug that a fix is submitted for should be verified and |
| 6 |
| peer reviewed. It should be verified by the reporter or another user. |
| 7 |
| If the reporter or another user are unable or unwilling to verify the |
| 8 |
| fix, the Team Lead should take responsibility for the verification. |
| 9 |
| Ideally, all bug fixes should be peer reviewed by the Team Lead and/or |
| 10 |
| other team members before the bug is marked as RESOLVED. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Again, Gentoo is not a large corporation or Debian. The assumption is |
| 13 |
that the majority of fixes are done correctly the first time, and this |
| 14 |
assumption is valid. Hence, the default behaviour is to mark bugs as |
| 15 |
RESOLVED, with reopening being an entirely legitimate and encouraged |
| 16 |
response for those occasional instances where the resolution was not |
| 17 |
sufficient. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives