Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libuv: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:41:01
Message-Id: 20150119104048.1efbf801@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libuv: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild ChangeLog by hasufell
1 On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:26:55 +0000
2 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Patrick Lauer (patrick):
5 > > patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55
6 > >
7 > > Modified: ChangeLog
8 > > Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild
9 > > Log:
10 > > Bump
11 > >
12 >
13 > I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages.
14 > That includes QA team members.
15
16 The only (QA) problem I see is the pointless removal of the ebuild in
17 question and the subsequent addition of a pointless revision bump with
18 no clue as to why it was removed or why the revision bump was required:
19
20 *libuv-1.2.1-r1 (16 Jan 2015)
21
22 16 Jan 2015; Julian Ospald <hasufell@g.o>
23 +libuv-1.2.1-r1.ebuild:
24 version bump
25
26 16 Jan 2015; Julian Ospald <hasufell@g.o> -libuv-1.2.1.ebuild:
27 rm unreviewed ebuild
28
29
30 Also, nobody brought up the QA role but you.
31
32
33 jer

Replies