Archives
Archives
| From: | Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2014 18:30:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140530183032.GA20205@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 04:34:09PM +0000, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 | > Tom Wijsman: |
| 3 | > > |
| 4 | > > Please no p.mask for a single line being wrong... |
| 5 | > > |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > That's nonsense. The amount of wrong lines doesn't matter. A single |
| 8 | > wrong line in the kernel can break your whole system as well. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Please p.mask (or patch) immediately. There is no point in waiting. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | I'd appreciate any patch on the Gentoo Handbook to use another tool for |
| 13 | initramfs. I have some experience with dracut, but the last dracut generated |
| 14 | initramfs failed on my system, whereas genkernel's still goes well. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | The last Dracut generated initramfs also failed on SELinux systems, but that |
| 17 | isn't something that cannot be worked around... |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Wkr, |
| 20 | Sven Vermeulen |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? | Alexander Tsoy <alexander@××××.me> |