Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS headers in ebuilds
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:42:17
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43RatT9CdSfAX+JmUF4FZgGxPiugtjLzfyU10RU8WeSEA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] CVS headers in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 > Does anyone still use the CVS $Id$ keywords that are in all ebuilds'
3 > headers, or are they being expanded anywhere? Or is there any other
4 > reason why they should be kept?
5 >
6 > In fact, the council had already voted to drop them in its 20141014
7 > meeting:
8 >
9 > Can we drop CVS headers post-migration?
10 > Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge,
11 > radhermit, rich0, williamh
12
13 Please get a fix for repoman lined up before dropping the line from ebuilds.
14
15 floppym@naomi systemd % head -n 4 systemd-9999.ebuild
16 # Copyright 1999-2016 Gentoo Foundation
17 # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
18
19 EAPI=6
20 floppym@naomi systemd % repoman full
21
22 RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
23 ebuild.badheader 1
24 sys-apps/systemd/systemd-9999.ebuild: Malformed Id header on line: 3