Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:16:04
Message-Id: 90786400-68ed-d443-5a81-6665bd942a26@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On 07/11/2017 04:13 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2 > On 07/11/2017 03:47 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
3 >> The main risk of breakage of a package moving from testing to
4 >> stable is always at build time anyway.
5 >
6 > citation needed
7 >
8
9 Anecdotal evidence against, currently gnupg 2.1.21 scdaemon bug will
10 happily sign a third party public keyblock's UID using signature subkey
11 on smartcard, which results in useless signature that doesn't have any
12 effect, but the application builds fine.
13
14 This means gnupg 2.1.21 is not a candidate for stabilization, but it
15 certainly builds fine.
16
17 --
18 Kristian Fiskerstrand
19 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
20 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o>