| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 3:42 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:15:58 AM CEST, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> Here are the violations: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html#binEssentialUserCommandBinaries |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html#sbinSystemBinaries |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html#libEssentialSharedLibrariesAndKern |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> well, those are not violations: fhs mandates a certain set of |
| 14 |
>> binaries in those paths; this is still the case with a usr-merged |
| 15 |
>> system. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> i thought the symlinks would be a problem, but fhs states: |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> The following directories, or symbolic links to directories, are required in /. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> so, really, i dont see any violation there |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Nice. They added that to fix it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
More likely you missed it in the past because 2004's FHS 2.3 has |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
"The following directories, or symbolic links to directories, are |
| 28 |
required in /." |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
in |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html#REQUIREMENTS |
Archives