1 |
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb: |
2 |
> On 22/11/12 11:22 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there |
6 |
>>>> is no herd listed (but their might be other maintainers): |
7 |
>> I didn't say I was dropping any of the packages, merely making an |
8 |
>> explicit list of packages I maintain, that other developers are |
9 |
>> welcome to touch - if they want to take them over explicitly, that |
10 |
>> would be great too. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> .. For certain things, I think it would be very beneficial for this |
14 |
> to be true (other dev's welcome to touch) across the tree. Maybe if |
15 |
> there is enough general support for it, we should change our default |
16 |
> of "never touch a maintainer's package without permission of the |
17 |
> maintainer/herd", to "OK to touch unless package metadata explicitly |
18 |
> requests not to" ...? And we can put a tag in the metadata to |
19 |
> indicate this (or even to indicate what other dev's can and can't |
20 |
> touch -- ie, can touch *DEPEND, can bump EAPI, cannot add features, |
21 |
> cannot bump)? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Thoughts? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
What certain things do you have in mind? In wich situation do you see a |
29 |
simple "May i touch the package?/ok for this patch?" as too much to do |
30 |
before touching a package? |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
|
34 |
Thomas Sachau |
35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |