1 |
Oops. Well then, if that's the standard, all for it! Maybe I shouldn't |
2 |
write stuff like this so late at night ;). |
3 |
|
4 |
Thanks for setting me straight, |
5 |
-Aaron |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
On 13 Jun 2001 02:25:32 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: |
9 |
> hi aaron, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2001 09:02 schrieben Sie: |
12 |
> > I have question/suggestion. Is it really necessary to put mozilla, |
13 |
> > gnome and others in /opt? I know it keeps it a bit more organzed and |
14 |
> > such, but it really makes it a pain when compiling things. Some |
15 |
> > programs, despite what they're told to use via the configure script |
16 |
> > insist on using includes from /usr/include instead of |
17 |
> > /opt/gnome/include. If not changing it, at least provide sympolic |
18 |
> > links or something (ie ln -s /usr/gnome/include/* /usr/include/ ). I |
19 |
> > think it would solve quite a few problems. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> |
22 |
> if i remember correctly does the Linux Standard Base define to put |
23 |
> gnome, kde etc in /opt - so your "things" configure scripts/Makefiles |
24 |
> should be adjusted to look there too/first. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> > -Aaron |
27 |
> |
28 |
> greetings |
29 |
> Thilo |
30 |
> |
31 |
> _______________________________________________ |
32 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
33 |
> gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org |
34 |
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
35 |
> |