Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Blew <ablew@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] make install suggestion/question
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:39:43
Message-Id: 992443141.15675.6.camel@atomic
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] make install suggestion/question by Thilo Bangert
1 Oops. Well then, if that's the standard, all for it! Maybe I shouldn't
2 write stuff like this so late at night ;).
3
4 Thanks for setting me straight,
5 -Aaron
6
7
8 On 13 Jun 2001 02:25:32 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
9 > hi aaron,
10 >
11 > Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2001 09:02 schrieben Sie:
12 > > I have question/suggestion. Is it really necessary to put mozilla,
13 > > gnome and others in /opt? I know it keeps it a bit more organzed and
14 > > such, but it really makes it a pain when compiling things. Some
15 > > programs, despite what they're told to use via the configure script
16 > > insist on using includes from /usr/include instead of
17 > > /opt/gnome/include. If not changing it, at least provide sympolic
18 > > links or something (ie ln -s /usr/gnome/include/* /usr/include/ ). I
19 > > think it would solve quite a few problems.
20 > >
21 >
22 > if i remember correctly does the Linux Standard Base define to put
23 > gnome, kde etc in /opt - so your "things" configure scripts/Makefiles
24 > should be adjusted to look there too/first.
25 >
26 > > -Aaron
27 >
28 > greetings
29 > Thilo
30 >
31 > _______________________________________________
32 > gentoo-dev mailing list
33 > gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
34 > http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
35 >