Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 19:01:14
Message-Id: 20080526210110.2633be4b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split by Arun Raghavan
1 On Sun, 25 May 2008 02:26:42 +0530
2 "Arun Raghavan" <arunisgod@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > if has_version =dev-python/gtkspell-2*; then
5 > LICENSE="GPL-2"
6 > else
7 > LICENSE="LGPL-2.1"
8 > fi
9 >
10 > There is currently *no* way to express this in an ebuild without
11 > invalidating the cache. For now this is just a theoretical problem,
12 > but worthy of consideration nonetheless.
13
14 LICENSE="GPL-2 LGPL-2.1" is a bit awkward, but valid, and is the
15 current practice for multi-licensed packages.
16
17
18 Kind regards,
19 JeR
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list