| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of |
| 3 |
> our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Gentoo_git_workflow#Sign-Off |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I agree. Generally it is used to signify agreement to a developer |
| 9 |
certificate of origin. I would recommend using it for any other |
| 10 |
purpose, especially since there has been talk of instituting a DCO for |
| 11 |
Gentoo (based on the Linux DCO). We're not at the point of doing that |
| 12 |
just yet, but I wouldn't stick something entirely different in that |
| 13 |
field so that if we do institute a DCO we end up doing it differently |
| 14 |
than every other project that uses Git. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If we want to capture this it should go in its own header. If the |
| 17 |
goal is to capture the repoman version, then I'd just capture the |
| 18 |
repoman version, or some identifier for the set of rules repoman was |
| 19 |
checking against at the moment (I'm not sure if repoman uses any kind |
| 20 |
of data updated outside of portage releases). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives