| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Duft Markus wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex. |
| 4 |
> > It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I |
| 5 |
> though |
| 6 |
> > about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and |
| 7 |
> > dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same for flex). What do you think |
| 8 |
> about |
| 9 |
> > this? Before we started using portage at our company I built the |
| 10 |
> > runtimes only for winnt, so I know this works (for me)... |
| 11 |
> Does yacc build+work maybe? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Hmm, haven't tried, I must admit, since our software has an explicit |
| 14 |
depend on binson, since it uses it's runtime library. That's why I would |
| 15 |
require distinct packages for bin and runtime. Bin should be built as |
| 16 |
interix executable, which dependes on m4, which I just can't get to work |
| 17 |
on winnt, and runtime should be built as winnt, since I need to link |
| 18 |
against it. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
After playing _many_ hours, this seems to be the only solution. If there |
| 21 |
are objections against this, I can do it in a local overlay. I just |
| 22 |
wanted to discuss it, to not do it in the overlay when others might want |
| 23 |
this too, and just don't have time to do it :) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 30 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
| 31 |
> E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 32 |
> GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives