| 1 |
Hi gang. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Finally all the issues with blas-* and lapack-* packages have been resolved. |
| 4 |
All these packages are in the tree and unmasked (~x86, ~amd64 and some ~ppc) |
| 5 |
and the corresponding virtuals were enabled. |
| 6 |
These ebuilds provide parallel installation of reference or atlas based |
| 7 |
libraries, shared libs and few more niceties, plus they have some issues with |
| 8 |
gcc/f77 resolved. This is to say that they are the preferred blas/atlas |
| 9 |
ebuilds and old stuff (app-sci/{blas,atlas,lapack}) is deprecated as of now. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
ATTN: sci devs and maintainers of packages that use blas or lapack. |
| 12 |
Please update your ebuilds to depend on virtual/blas or virtual/lapack. |
| 13 |
Switching between active implementation is performed with blas-config or |
| 14 |
lapack-config scripts, that follow gcc-config convention |
| 15 |
(see app-config --help for more details). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Q to libtool maintainers: when can we expect >=sys-devel/libtool-1.5 going |
| 18 |
stable on x86 and ppc? Some rough idea would be wellcome as it is hollding |
| 19 |
these packages from going stable as well. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
George |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives