1 |
>> Not exactly, you are missing a very important thing your installation |
2 |
>> had in common with a lot of other peoples. |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> The Portage Tree. |
5 |
>> Just something to think about :) |
6 |
|
7 |
>I think you're missing something though - my system (and your system) |
8 |
also |
9 |
>have gcc and python and all the neat gnu utilities like awk, and grep, |
10 |
and |
11 |
>bash, etc. These are all *different versions* depending on when you |
12 |
>last --updated them. The portage tree is also *VERY* different based on |
13 |
when |
14 |
>you last ran emerge sync - it changes hourly. My portage tree is |
15 |
different |
16 |
>than someone who syncd this AM (as I have not done so for about two |
17 |
weeks, |
18 |
>my ram blew up! waiting on RMA.:-( ) The absolute lowest common |
19 |
denominator |
20 |
>that anyone has is the product they installed from - which are the |
21 |
various |
22 |
>stages.. |
23 |
|
24 |
Its not so much that I'm missing that, and more that I am attempting to |
25 |
introduce a different concept of what might quantify a Gentoo 'Release'. |
26 |
|
27 |
If the 'Release' was based on a snapshot of the Portage Tree (with |
28 |
security fixes backported of course, most likely major bug fixes as |
29 |
well), then there would be something uniform and standard to release |
30 |
against. |
31 |
|
32 |
--Todd |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |