Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Todd Berman <tberman@g.o>
To: 'matt c' <matt@×××××××××××××××.org>, 'gentoo-dev ML' <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:47:06
Message-Id: 005c01c36355$3dc1d8f0$8500a8c0@PROTON
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's by matt c
1 >> Not exactly, you are missing a very important thing your installation
2 >> had in common with a lot of other peoples.
3 >>
4 >> The Portage Tree.
5 >> Just something to think about :)
6
7 >I think you're missing something though -  my system (and your system)
8 also
9 >have gcc and python and all the neat gnu utilities like awk, and grep,
10 and
11 >bash, etc. These are all *different versions* depending on when you
12 >last --updated them. The portage tree is also *VERY* different based on
13 when
14 >you last ran emerge sync - it changes hourly. My portage tree is
15 different
16 >than someone who syncd this AM (as I have not done so for about two
17 weeks,
18 >my ram blew up! waiting on RMA.:-(  ) The absolute lowest common
19 denominator
20 >that anyone has is the product they installed from - which are the
21 various
22 >stages..
23
24 Its not so much that I'm missing that, and more that I am attempting to
25 introduce a different concept of what might quantify a Gentoo 'Release'.
26
27 If the 'Release' was based on a snapshot of the Portage Tree (with
28 security fixes backported of course, most likely major bug fixes as
29 well), then there would be something uniform and standard to release
30 against.
31
32 --Todd
33  
34
35
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>