Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Dex Conner <cantcuckthis@××××××××××.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can app-office/sc be replaced by app-office/sc-im from GURU?
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 04:46:18
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can app-office/sc be replaced by app-office/sc-im from GURU? by Dex Conner
1 On June 28, 2022 1:37:19 AM GMT+02:00, Dex Conner <cantcuckthis@××××××××××.de> wrote:
2 >On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
3 >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> > My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
5 >> > app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
6 >> > and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
7 >> > anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
8 >>
9 >> We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
10 >> couple of open bugs.
11 >>
12 >> Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
13 >> Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
14 >> non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a
15 >> developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
16 >> project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
17 >> maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
18 >>
19 >
20 >I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon
21 >talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading
22 >to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by
23 >tomorrow.
24 >
25 >I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are
26 >merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull
27 >requests?
29 Please remove it only after merging, this creates a seemless transition for the users of this package.
31 Best regards
32 Andrew