Re: [gentoo-dev] Can app-office/sc be replaced by app-office/sc-im from GURU?

[Andrew Ammerlaan]

On June 28, 2022 1:37:19 AM GMT+02:00, Dex Conner <cantcuckthis@××××××××××.de> wrote:
>On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@×××××.com> wrote:
>> > My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
>> > app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
>> > and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
>> > anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
>>
>> We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
>> couple of open bugs.
>>
>> Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
>> Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
>> non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a
>> developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
>> project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
>> maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
>>
>
>I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon
>talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading
>to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by
>tomorrow.
>
>I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are
>merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull
>requests?

Please remove it only after merging, this creates a seemless transition for the users of this package.

Best regards
Andrew