1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Wednesday 16 March 2005 10:41 am, Chris White wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>So, they pretty much install the same thing... Can I put a blocker on |
7 |
>>this? Or does someone have a valid reason why I shouldn't... |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
>going by the description, it seems like libungif is pretty much pointless |
12 |
>now ? libgd has added back in gif support now that the LZW patent has |
13 |
>expired everywhere ... |
14 |
> |
15 |
>perhaps we can just clean out libungif and have everything use giflib now |
16 |
>-mike |
17 |
>-- |
18 |
>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
That's what I'm going to do then. |
24 |
|
25 |
libungif is now being removed from the true to honor the better giflib |
26 |
with expired LWZ patent. On this friday, I will be doing the dep |
27 |
adjustments in the tree. I will also be creating a bug to track issues |
28 |
with giflib not working with certain programs. I highly doubt this |
29 |
however, and anticipate a rather clean movement (knock on wood :|). |
30 |
Rember: this Friday, you have been warned. Speak now or forever hold |
31 |
your peace :P. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Chris White <chriswhite@g.o> |
35 |
------------------------ |
36 |
Sound | Video | PPC |
37 |
ChrisWhite @ irc.freenode.net |
38 |
cpw @ irc.freenode.net |