| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:04 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gconfbe1.uno.so (requires |
| 4 |
> > libORBit-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> binary packages should never be in /usr/ |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Is /opt ignored? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> yes, because our policy specifically says binary packages in /opt |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It's not that easy for every package. For instance openoffice and |
| 13 |
openoffice-bin need to got to the same location, cause OOo does a user |
| 14 |
install and this will break when changing between them (and all the |
| 15 |
settings / paths and so on). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So either we would have both in /opt which then means that the source |
| 18 |
based OOo is ignored too, or we have them in /usr/lib which results in |
| 19 |
the ooo-bin annoyance. I would say the second one is less harmful. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Btw, there is a long running bug about the revdep-rebuild, which also |
| 22 |
has a solution for this: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32276 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
bye |
| 27 |
Andreas |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Andreas Proschofsky |
| 31 |
Gentoo Developer / OpenOffice.org |
Archives