| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:11:16 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> My opinion is to make it clear that the doc use flag always controls |
| 5 |
>> whether or not to install documentation and make it clear in the |
| 6 |
>> devmanual. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The doc use flag is used where there is a reason to make documentation |
| 9 |
> optional rather than mandatory. Examples of such reasons include |
| 10 |
> increased dependencies (e.g. Doxygen, which pulls in a fair bit), |
| 11 |
> increased build time (e.g. Doxygen, which can be frickin' slow) or |
| 12 |
> substantially increased disk usage. If there's no substantial cost to |
| 13 |
> documentation, it should always be installed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yep but we should for example document what constitues increased disk |
| 17 |
usage. How about "several megabytes or tens of files"? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Petteri |
Archives