| 1 |
On Wed, 22 May 2013 11:07:26 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations |
| 5 |
> > > are enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? |
| 6 |
> > > (What is an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Why are they enhancements? Them having been this way is not a reason |
| 9 |
> > not to change the priority and severity fields to make more sense. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Do you agree that a version bump, i.e. an ebuild entering ~arch is |
| 12 |
> an enhancement? Then why would it be different if the same ebuild gets |
| 13 |
> promoted from ~arch to arch? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Is a version bump an enhancement per se? If all version bumps are |
| 16 |
enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is |
| 17 |
an enhanced version bump to begin with, Mozilla?) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
With kind regards, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 26 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 27 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives