Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:14:31
Message-Id: 3c32af40806101514t2c38f8dbs76172bb613429d8c@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 by Federico Ferri
1 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Federico Ferri <xaero@××××××.it> wrote:
2 >
3 > The so-called shebang; very good in my opinion!
4 >
5 > Works very well for true shell scripts. why it can't work for ebuilds?
6
7 This option was already discussed when GLEP 55 was proposed, and in my
8 opinion it's totally discarded. The concept of shebang doesn't apply
9 here at all. Plus /usr/bin/ebuild is a binary provided by portage
10 which has nothing to do with the process of sourcing ebuilds nor even
11 with the internals of portage (not to speak of other package
12 managers).
13
14 Regards,
15 --
16 Santiago M. Mola
17 Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>