| 1 |
> I am seriously considering implementing and supporting SPF[1] on our |
| 2 |
> mail |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
great! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> For the most part, this can be done without any significant impact on |
| 7 |
> your |
| 8 |
> day to day gentoo.org email lives. However, the one (major) change |
| 9 |
> will be |
| 10 |
> that devs would be required to use asmtp on dev.gentoo.org rather than |
| 11 |
> sending from a non-gentoo.org smtp server. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
why not have the gentoo.org spf record include '?all' so that |
| 14 |
non-gentoo smtp servers will be treated as 'neutral'? this way, devs |
| 15 |
can continue to use their own smtp servers. this method will not have |
| 16 |
the full benefits of '-all' or even '~all' but it will be a start... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
fwiw, google.com, gnu.org, and others currently use '?all' in their spf |
| 19 |
record. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives