| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:08:41AM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 2 |
> "Ideally any bug that a fix is submitted for should be verified and peer |
| 3 |
> reviewed. It should be verified by the reporter or another user. If the |
| 4 |
> reporter or another user are unable or unwilling to verify the fix, the |
| 5 |
> Team Lead should take responsibility for the verification. Ideally, all |
| 6 |
> bug fixes should be peer reviewed by the Team Lead and/or other team |
| 7 |
> members before the bug is marked as RESOLVED. " |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think right now the situation is so far from ideal that we should not |
| 10 |
focus too much on ideally, but rather on realistically as we do now. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The number of open bugs in Gentoo's bugzilla keeps growing. It really is |
| 13 |
triage. And when doing triage, it's still valid to say that ideally |
| 14 |
something would be done so and so, but you know that's never gonna |
| 15 |
happen. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If the developer shortage was not as big as it is, we could probably |
| 18 |
really do something with your proposition. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Maurice. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Maurice van der Pot |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@g.o http://www.gentoo.org |
| 27 |
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@××××××××.com http://www.kfk4ever.com |
Archives