From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted | ||
Date: | Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:42:39 | ||
Message-Id: | CAATnKFDOpJjsBYGLnCi_6AKpNuTuWWd4nwc936KxFFT5G93zmw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted by Rich Freeman |
1 | On 15 March 2015 at 11:37, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Suggestions: |
4 | > gentoo-repo |
5 | > gentoo-repository |
6 | > gentoo-main |
7 | > gentoo-repo-main |
8 | > gentoo-repository-main |
9 | > |
10 | |
11 | Similarly in the "solve confusion as to purpose" for newbies: |
12 | |
13 | gentoo-packages |
14 | gentoo-ebuilds |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | The names would be possibly be incorrect under some interpretations, but |
18 | they'd be clearer to newbies what its for. |
19 | |
20 | You could consider a repository to be "A collection of packages", and all |
21 | files that are not packages to be metadata. |
22 | |
23 | -- |
24 | Kent |
25 | |
26 | *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |