1 |
I tried out the 0.2 version of udev today, and I realize that its way rough |
2 |
so early in the development, but I must say I was disappointed with it's |
3 |
current implementation ( and the lousy attitude of the udev FAQ "if you don't |
4 |
like it stick with devfs" didn't help). Currently I have some small concerns |
5 |
about adopting this as a whole ( somewhere on down the line)- |
6 |
|
7 |
1)The present package consists of a tarball with just about every device node |
8 |
you could make (excepting small things like sound, ppp, more than 4 ttyS*'s) |
9 |
Is this going to be a standard, or will some form of intuitive /dev entries be |
10 |
imp'd? IIRC, the tarball is about 1.4k device nodes, and I think I need 100 |
11 |
on the outside. |
12 |
|
13 |
2) Since this won't automatically create these nodes ( unless a hotplug event |
14 |
occurs), or load the dependent modules, doesn't this seem like a step back to |
15 |
the old system, but with a name-mapping steroided hotplug? |
16 |
|
17 |
3) Don't get me wrong..I'm not flaming the package,and I realize devfs is crap |
18 |
as well..but the score is devfsd( crap but makes nodes and loads mods on the |
19 |
fly) and udev (maps names and supposedly does stuff with hotplugging that |
20 |
hotplug never amounted to.( and is dev'd by the hotplug peeps?ironic)). All |
21 |
that aside, what is udev going to do for the desktop? I have devices I could |
22 |
swap(USB) but with most comps coming with like 6 usb ports, I cant see more |
23 |
than some pendrive swapping at user level. Yeah, I know theres peeps out |
24 |
there with 80 pendrives and 8 hot-swappable hdd's, but is this the majority |
25 |
of users? For the likely many of us who dont need to swap and have had the |
26 |
same hardware on the same nodes that dont ever change..what does udev bring |
27 |
to the table? |
28 |
|
29 |
Forgive me if I've gone delusional.. I was just under the impression that udev |
30 |
was going to do everything that devfsd does now _and_ add name mapping, and |
31 |
apparently I was wrong. I'm just planning for the future since seeing the |
32 |
udev changes going into our init system.. we got no choice about the devfs |
33 |
and I feel it's going the same way for udev. I'm not trying to slight the |
34 |
obviously hard work that was put into it, but what about choice? to devfs or |
35 |
not to devfs? to udev or not to udev? Or is it merely choice with package |
36 |
selection, and not with the overall package that is Gentoo? |
37 |
|
38 |
Criticism appreciated, discussion welcomed, craziness and flames- please pipe |
39 |
to /dev/null:) |
40 |
-- |
41 |
Chuck Brewer |
42 |
Registered Linux User #284015 |
43 |
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred. |