| 1 |
On 29 September 2012 18:20, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha? Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Hello, |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent |
| 9 |
>> earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) |
| 10 |
>> eclasses for review. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng |
| 13 |
>> replacement. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> Hi, |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Are you saying that you are going to remove the python-distutils-ng |
| 18 |
> eclass in favour of the new eclasses? I don't quite understand the |
| 19 |
> reasons to be honest. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The current python.eclass is too horribly complicated, and should go |
| 22 |
the way of the dodo ASAP; while on the other hand python-distutils-ng |
| 23 |
is too limited (e.g. for non-distutils multiple-implementation python |
| 24 |
needing packages) and oddly named. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I fully support this attempt to improve the current situation, and as |
| 27 |
I understand so does most of our python team. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Cheers, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 33 |
Gentoo developer |
| 34 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives