| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Dan Armak wrote: |
| 5 |
| On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:28, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 6 |
|>a useflag could solve the issue as well a all inclusive metaebuild for X. |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| To solve this issue it would have to be an on-by-default flag, i.e. |
| 9 |
| 'noxserver'. I know some people are strongly against nofoo flags. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Or, you could just activate it in the base profile. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
| Also, we'd have to include RDEPEND="!noxserver? ( x11-base/xorg-x11 )" in |
| 14 |
| every ebuild in the tree being updated to depend on |
| 15 |
x11-base/xorg-libs. Or an |
| 16 |
| eclass to the same effect. This would be easily forgotten in new |
| 17 |
ebuilds, and |
| 18 |
| then we'd get inconsistent behavior. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That's a good point. Any ideas on how to deal with it? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Donnie |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQFDV+VJXVaO67S1rtsRAoLsAJ0aiEOHDnpTJ/8vM5ImM23qmz1oXwCeLgG4 |
| 28 |
LVQZG0Vp/BG5IiAw5IlYc7Q= |
| 29 |
=jMQO |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives