| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 21:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Stabling a package which is not in packahe.mask is only a support |
| 3 |
> burden if package maintainers are abusing ~arch. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> If you don't agree that it should be stable, don't move it out out of |
| 6 |
> package.mask. ~arch is for stable candidates, and by sticking a package |
| 7 |
> you maintain in ~arch you are implicitly asking for it to be tested |
| 8 |
> with the aim of marking it stable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Which part of "I agree with you" didn't you understand? :( |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
However, it still comes across like you're trying to change the subject, |
| 13 |
even after being asked not to :( |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I've put my point across, but you're determined not to address it |
| 16 |
directly. I guess there's nothing else to say on this topic. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Stu |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 23 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 26 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 27 |
-- |
Archives