Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:55:07
Message-Id: 42777472.9030504@salomon.at
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager by Alec Warner
1 Alec Warner wrote:
2 > Brian Jackson wrote:
3 >>>It's fancy, but what about ROOT? You don't like it just because you'd have /usr/local/usr/bin/foo?
4 > ROOT doens't work for DEPENDS, only [R,P]DEPENDS which means I can't
5 > install everything for pkg FOO in ROOT="/opt" fex. Mostly useful for
6 > alt arches when /usr is taken by the primary OS and you need portage's
7 > DEPEND packages to go somewhere else.
8
9 It's not just the DEPENDS: an executable built with ROOT=/usr/local
10 becomes *copied/extracted* into /usr/local/usr/bin, but it _knows_
11 (compiled in) to run from /usr/bin.
12 ROOT is intended to "cross-bootstrap" (better words?) a stage{1,2,3} or
13 the like to be copied to another box - or used with 'chroot /usr/local',
14 which is not what i understand as how to use a secondary pkgm.
15
16 ~haubi
17 --
18 Michael Haubenwallner SALOMON Automation GmbH
19 Forschung & Entwicklung A-8114 Friesach bei Graz
20 mailto:michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at http://www.salomon.at
21 No HTML/MIME please, see http://expita.com/nomime.html
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list