| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/02/13 01:14 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 5 |
> 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>: |
| 6 |
>> On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if |
| 11 |
>> the newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> That should be probably the best approach, to actually kill of the |
| 14 |
> lone ones and keep the linux-firmware only. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Tom |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
There aren't cases where a user with older hardware would want to have |
| 21 |
access to the older (lone) firmwares, is there? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlEVQMkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAqVwD/S9mjN2lGoQbffIRZqraAg5SI |
| 28 |
NxsksQcjwS0EgtTQ2MYBAKeCzrLhtXRpQSn6i2fXlDLFk3W1Qa/RhiPQmWfU3iCw |
| 29 |
=SPkG |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives