Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:28:40
Message-Id: 1710293.ao4jWK1sT1@pinacolada
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps by Zac Medico
1 Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018, 08:01:08 CET schrieb Zac Medico:
2 >
3 > According to Gentoo policy, future ebuild dependency changes need to be
4 > accompanied by a revision bump in order to trigger rebuilds for users.
5 > Therefore, you should only need to use --changed-deps=y for a single
6 > deep @world update. After that, if you encounter installed packages with
7 > outdated dependencies in a future deep @world update, then you should
8 > report it as a bug.
9
10 Did you come up with a solution how to handle eclass-generated dependency
11 changes then?
12
13 I'd loathe to have to do identical revision bumps for, say, all perl-
14 module.eclass consumers...
15
16 --
17 Andreas K. Hüttel
18 dilfridge@g.o
19 Gentoo Linux developer
20 (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>