| 1 |
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 05:56:56 +1300 |
| 2 |
Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:23:58 +0000 |
| 4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Because it isn't... Are set names atoms? Are package names without |
| 7 |
> > an associated category atoms? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If I use the content of man 5 ebuild as a guide, I'd say no, sets |
| 10 |
> can't be atoms. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What about if you read the user-oriented documentation, which has a |
| 13 |
different semi-definition? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives